Powered by Max Banner Ads 

What is your opinion of a Homeopathic Doctor treating cancer?

Do you believe in Natural or Homeopathic treatments for serious illnesses such as Cancer? Do you believe in any “alternative” treatments for illnesses? Is conventional health care the ONLY way to treat our bodies?

Alternative methods of treating cancer can be far better than the conventional treatments that statistically show 2% to 3% 5 year survival rates. That is less than a placebo effect. Hodgkin’s and testis Cancer Treatments show between 30% and 40% success using those techniques, but those only account for about 3% of all cancers.

Homeopathic medicine has many aspects to it that do not work, but you really have to define carefully what you mean by homeopathic treatments. Alternative treatments in many cases do not rely on the typical homeopathic type of treatments.

A very good example is the GERSON clinic in Mexico that has had tremendous successes with fighting cancer and other degenerative diseases. Dr. Gabriel Cousins has successfully treated and cured diabetes type 2 in 30 days using detoxing and diet. He is a medical doctor trained in America that has rejected many of the typical medical treatments that he has found to be very ineffective in treating many degenerative diseases. Here’s a video of what he did and the video shows the actual patients and interviews with them: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/simply-raw-reversing-diabetes-in-30-days/

Researchers have been trying to solve the cancer issue for over 100 years and the results are abominable at best. The typical clinical trial will use placebos or sugar pills to do double blind studies. If the results are less than 30% in these trials, it is assumed the drug failed and is no better than the sugar pill. The success for cancer treatments are far less than the sugar pill, so any treatment whether homeopathic or chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery are NOT WORKING.

EDIT: Oh brother, Rhianna I see you are at it again, survival means surviving. Only 2% to 3% survive not die, the rest die. You are so busy defending the non-defensible you really need to get a life dear. The data is published everywhere how bad cancer treatments are doing, it’s only new news to those that want to defend their profession at all costs. I see the usual suspects have shown up to put there typical skeptical remarks with no evidence to back up their claims. Where is the data that shows cancer treatments are better than the 2% to 3% other than a couple types of cancers. What about breast cancer? How is the medical “cures” doing on that one? If we were winning the war on cancer, why are the deaths overtaking heart disease as the number one killer.

If the skeptics were really skeptics and not just people with a critics agenda against alternative medicine, they would be very vocal on how bad cancer treatments are doing. It is obvious to most people here that they are not clever or educated as they purport, but just want-a-be intellectuals with an agenda trolling the answers.

EDIT: “lo-mcg” I like your answer, but you really need to talk to the Gerson people and go there to see the successes and talk to the patients in total remission. Dr. Gerson testified in the Congressional hearing in 1946 and showed case after case with a 50% cure rate for cancers and other degenerative diseases using his techniques. He was precluded from doing his research in the U.S. after that hearing where the FDA and two drug companies bought and paid for the Congressional results. Look where the drug treatments have gotten us. It’s really disgusting the amount of money and time wasted on this BAD SCIENCE.

EDIT: Dave, you need to free yourself from the lies you believe. Anyone will get thrown in jail if you use anything to attempt treating cancer in the U.S. other than the abusive, totally ineffective chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery that are approved. It has nothing to do with the success of the treatments because if it did, those using that abusive chemotherapy & radiation would be put in jail. It is working no better than a sugar pill. Talk about the definition of a quack! These guys are right up there in that category. Would you take your car to a mechanic that could only fix 2% to 3% of the cars he worked on? How long do you think he would be in business? Now if it were the only way you could get your car fixed by law, what would you think about that? I think you would probably start looking for alternatives. lol.

good luck to you